Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 04, 2009, 03:06:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length

News   ·    Gas Prices   ·    Weather   ·    Auctions   ·    Dating
Real Estate   ·    WebCams   ·    Traffic   ·    Hotels   ·    Jobs
Need to make hotel reservations? Check out Sacramento area hotel information and rates! Click here!
5,061 Posts in 2,013 Topics by 1,615 Members
Latest Member: princess
Search: Advanced search
View Your Startpage | Forum Rules | Advertising | Sacramento, California Online Community RSS feeds  

The Sacramento, CA Online Community | Sacramento, CA Discussion | Politics | California | Topic: Schwarzenegger plans to sign wage cut, layoff order Thursday
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »

 
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Schwarzenegger plans to sign wage cut, layoff order Thursday  (Read 2747 times)
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« on: July 29, 2008, 02:39:20 PM »

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger postponed plans on Monday to sign an executive order to cut our salaries down to minimum wage.  Also, Senate President pro Tem Don Perata dropped plans to hold a budget vote today (Tuesday).

Speculation of why Schwarzenegger and Perata postponed their actions is rampant in the Capitol.  “One thing is certain,” said Local 1000 President Yvonne Walker, “Pressure from the public, from Local 1000 and from our allies is beginning to make a difference ... we need to keep it up.”

The governor’s office announced Monday that Schwarzenegger would delay signing the order until Thursday, which would roll back salaries for nearly 200,000 state workers to the federal minimum wage of $6.55 an hour.  Under the proposed plan more than 22,000 seasonal, permanent intermittent and part time employees would be laid off.

Besides Local 1000’s opposition, many others have criticized the governor’s plan. State Controller John Chiang has said he will not comply with the governor’s order, if signed. The Legislative Analyst’s Office has raised questions about the legality of the order, the state’s Congressional delegation released a letter asking the governor to drop the plan and Local 1000 allies have turned in nearly 30,000 signatures opposing the wage cut.

“We’re hoping that the governor will come to his senses and drop this ill-conceived plan,” said Local 1000 President Yvonne Walker. “But we’ll keep fighting. His order does nothing to create a balanced budget, but does real damage to the state of California and harms thousands of families.”   

Republican legislators, who want huge budget cuts but have not yet released a detailed plan of their own, were holding up the process, Walker said.  “Democrats have proposed a balance between responsible program cuts and increased revenues,” Walker said. “The Republican legislators need to step up, make responsible proposals and stop stalling the process for real budget reform.”
Logged
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2008, 02:40:31 PM »

What's At Stake:

• Over 200,000 state workers and their families would be reduced to poverty-level wages until a budget is passed. See http://www.seiu1000.org and http://www.sco.ca.gov/ for more information.

• The emergency fund for Medi-Cal payments has run out, and clinics and hospitals are scrambling to stay open.

• If the legislature doesn't pass a budget soon, California will ruin its credit rating and be forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars more in interest.

Logged
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2008, 02:41:09 PM »

Sample Letter:

Subject: Hard-Working Californians Shouldn't Pay for Budget Gridlock

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

California's hard-working state workers cannot be allowed to bear the brunt of political gridlock. The Governor's threat to reduce their salaries to the federal minimum wage is a cruel threat that illustrates what's wrong in Sacramento. The broken politics that threaten to hold them and their families hostage hurt all of us in the long run.

The people of California cannot wait any longer for you and your colleagues to pass a responsible budget that solves California's deficit with a careful mix of cuts and new revenue.

With a $15 billion deficit, we cannot afford a budget that relies completely on cuts. That approach would do serious and lasting damage to everything we've invested in for years: our schools, our healthcare, our roads, our seniors, and our communities. We have to combine cuts with new revenue - and everyone has to pay their fair share of taxes. There are some good proposals on the table now to make sure everyone, even the wealthy and corporations, must pay their fair share.

I urge you to work with your colleagues and support a compromise budget such as the Conference Committee's budget or a budget with a similar mix of cuts and revenues.

We can't afford to wait any longer: state workers can't be pawns in this game, and the State of California cannot afford to ruin our credit rating and pay hundreds of millions of dollars in additional interest just because our legislators haven't compromised.

The people of California deserve better than this.

Sincerely,

Logged
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2008, 01:28:41 PM »

Send the governor a pink slip

Tell the governor because of his lack of leadership and total disregard for his workforce he is terminated.

Send him a PINK SLIP today.

Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (if you live in California)

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: You have been terminated

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

The State of California is currently without a budget and is facing a cash crisis. Your total lack of leadership has lead to yet another missed budget deadline and fiscal uncertainty for all Californians. You are terminated effective August 1, 2008.

Good luck in the future,
Your state employee workforce.


Sincerely,

Logged
Eric
Resident Resident
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 15
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,620



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2008, 11:53:41 AM »

It's Official: State Pay Cuts Order Signed

Quote
Gov. Schwarzenegger has signed an executive order that temporarily cuts about 200,000 state workers' pay to the federal $6.55 an hour minimum.

The pay cuts take effect immediately.

The order also the calls for the layoffs of about 22,000 temporary, part-time and contract state workers; eliminates almost all overtime and institutes a hiring freeze.

The governor issued the directives so, he says, the state can pay its bills.

Lawmakers have failed to agree on a spending plan for the fiscal year that began July 1, arguing over whether they should enact tax increases or steep cuts to close a $15.2 billion shortfall.

The pay cuts are expected to save the state about $1 billion a month, according to the governor's office.

State Controller John Chiang, whose office issues pay checks and pays bills, has said he would defy the order.

http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=45680&catid=2
Logged

Click here to tell your friends and family about the Sacramento, CA Online Community!
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2008, 01:30:09 PM »

Letter from California State Controller John Chiang to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger:



The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor of California
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger,

I understand that today you signed an executive order (Order) demanding the salaries of more than 200,000 civil servants who are covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) be cut to the federal minimum wage of $6.55 an hour. To the extent that the Order attempts to govern the constitutional duties for which I was independently elected to perform and, because it is based on faulty legal and factual premises, I will not comply with the Order.

Your Order to reduce the salaries of these civil servants, making them bear the brunt of the budget stalemate, appears to be based in part upon what you perceive to be a conclusive and unequivocal determination by the California Supreme Court in the case,  White v. Davis (May 1,2003) 30 Cal. 4th 528, that my authority to issue warrants to employees in the absence of a budget is limited to the minimum wage. One of the main purposes of the FLSA in creating a minimum wage standard was to protect vulnerable employees fiom employer wage exploitation. In furtherance of that objective, and in order to afford employees some level of protection, Congress set a minimum salary level for all employees covered by the Act. The FLSA does not, in any way, prevent an employer from paying more than the minimum wage.

In White v. Davis, this office took the position that due to technical limitations inherent in a payroll system that was developed more than 25 years ago, it was infeasible, if not impossible, to adjust payroll for the workforce to minimum wage during a budgetary impasse and, after the budget has been passed, to promptly restore the unpaid wages in a manner consistent with the law. Given the choice of paying nothing, which is a clear violation of the FLSA, and continuing to pay hll wages, my office opted for the latter option as a means of protecting the employees from unnecessary financial hardship and, moreover, from exposing the State to possible treble damages for failing to comply with the FLSA.

In reviewing the matter, the California Supreme Court specifically declined to rule on the amount of salary that could lawfully be paid during a budget impasse. In its ruling, the court concluded that "in order to comply with the FLSA, the state, during a budget impasse, must timely pay nonexempt employees who do not work overtime at least at the minimum wage rate." (italics added) But the court declined to specify whether the federal minimum wage or full salary is appropriate, opining, on page 68 of the decision, "In any event, as already noted, the Controller's claim of infeasibility was not fully litigated below, and thus we do not believe it would be appropriate to attempt to definitively resolve the claim at this juncture. . . ."

Also, contrary to your statement that the State is at risk, due to the budget impasse, of having insufficient cash to pay state expenditures, it should be pointed out that there is enough cash to meet all expenditures through September. As of June 30, unused borrowable resources totaled $12.7 billion. This is $3.6 billion higher than the $9.1 billion projected in your May revision to the budget. Should it be determined that the cash is insufficient, the law authorizes me to borrow money either through a Revenue Anticipation Note should there be a budget in place, or a Registered Reimbursement Warrant, commonly known as a RAW, in the absence of a budget. Some form of external borrowing is part of the State's normal cash management process and will occur regardless of when a budget is passed or what solutions are contemplated in the budget. Reducing employees to minimum wage will not save the State money and will not impact any forthcoming borrowing decisions. In fact, deferring compensation until after the budget is passed may well expedite the need for cash to meet the unpaid amounts as soon as the budget is signed.

Finally, it appears as though your Order, while purporting to require compliance with the White decision, is actually inapposite of your reading of that decision. On one hand, you incorrectly indicate that there exists no authority to pay employees not working overtime more than the minimum wage and then, on the other hand, purport to authorize full pay to certain classes of employees. If your reading of the case is correct, then my office cannot make exceptions for those public employees who are engaged in "services and functions of state government deemed critical and exempt." In other words, your reading of the court conclusion in White would mean I do not have authority to pay full wages to any FLSA-covered employee, including the firefighters on the front line in Butte County, the peace officers who patrol our streets and any other employee dedicated to "preserve and protect human life and safety." Your assertion that I do not have the authority to pay some FLSA workers their full pay, but do for others, is not supported by the Supreme Court ruling in White. I either have the authority to only pay minimum wage, or I do not.

In closing, I must reiterate that any attempted adjustments to the payroll system would result in payroll problems that would continue for months after a budget is enacted. I also am compelled, as the State's chief fiscal officer, to remind you that such a drastic cut in pay would cause huge fiscal harm to the families of more than 200,000 devoted civil servants. The loss of spending dollars will increase the loss in consumer confidence, and further deteriorate California's fi-agile economy. The Sacramento Bee on Thursday published an article noting that the pay cuts to the 112,500 state workers in the region would cost the area $15 million a day.

For these many reasons, I have no intention of complying with the Order and encourage you to continue to work with the Legislature on passing a budget and with my office to ensure we have sufficient funds to meet the State's financial obligations and pay for the education, health and public safety programs Californians expect and deserve.

Sincerely,

Original signed by:

JOHN CHIANG
California State Controller
Logged
Privacy916
Full Member
***

Karma: 7
Offline Offline

Posts: 161



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2008, 02:32:09 PM »

The Executive Order:



EXECUTIVE ORDER S-09-08

by the

Governor of the State of California

            WHEREAS the constitutional deadline for enacting a state budget for Fiscal Year 2008-09 has passed without the enactment of a budget; and

            WHEREAS in the absence of a budget, State government is constitutionally prohibited from making payments that are not compelled by either the State Constitution or federal law; and

            WHEREAS until there is a state budget, the State has no authority to pay the following payments:  (1) Vendors and Contractors for goods and services chargeable to Fiscal Year 2008-09; (2) Payroll for legislative staff, appointees, and exempt employees; (3) Payroll for other state employees beyond that required by federal labor law; (4) Highway User Taxes that are apportioned to the state, cities and counties for highway and road improvement projects; (5) Cal Grants to students in higher education; (6) Transfers to the Trial Courts; (7) Transfers to University of California, California State University, and Community Colleges; (8 ) Transportation Revolving Fund disbursements; (9) Non-revenue limit school payments; and (10) Payments for non-federally mandated social services programs such as Community Care Licensing, Adult Protective Services, State Only Foster Care; State Only Adoptions Assistance, and Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants; and (11) tax relief payments to low income seniors and disabled persons; and

            WHEREAS on May 1, 2003, the California Supreme Court, in White v. Davis, issued a decision that, in conjunction with other pre-existing court orders, clarified that during a period that there is no state budget in place, federal labor laws require the State to pay its nonexempt FLSA employees either federal minimum wage or, for those employees that work overtime, their full salaries plus overtime; and

            WHEREAS it is not known when a budget will be adopted for Fiscal Year 2008-09; and

            WHEREAS as a result of the late budget, there is a real and substantial risk that the State will have insufficient cash to pay for state expenditures; and   

            WHEREAS since June 2008, the unprecedented number and size of fires in California has created states of emergency that have required additional and substantial expenditures of cash to ensure that there are sufficient resources to effectively fight these fires and save lives and homes; and 

            WHEREAS it is critical that the State be able to meet any unforeseen emergency such as fire, flood or public health emergency and to continue to make timely payments on constitutionally and federally-mandated obligations and existing obligations to pay holders of state bonds; and

            WHEREAS due to the impending cash crisis and budget delay, the State may be forced to consider a Revenue Anticipation Warrant (RAW) at an exorbitant cost to the State, including hundreds of millions of dollars in credit enhancements, in order to make sure there is sufficient cash to pay for state expenditures; and

            WHEREAS after the late adoption of a budget, there will be additional cash demands because all of the deferred payments that were not permitted to be made during the budget impasse will become due and payable; and

            WHEREAS the late budget has resulted in loss of savings to the State in the amount of $164 million for July, and failure to enact a budget in August will result in additional loss of savings in the amount of $323 million; and

            WHEREAS as a result of the late budget, additional mitigation measures must be implemented to offset the loss of savings and to ensure that there is sufficient cash to make the State's payments; and

            WHEREAS the State employs nearly 22,000 retired annuitants, permanent intermittent employees, and seasonal employees and the State hires new employees at the rate of approximately 1,700 per month; and

            WHEREAS except for services and functions of state government deemed critical by this Order, additional mitigation measures need to be taken to immediately reduce expenditures and preserve cash, including the following: (1) halting all hiring, transfers and promotions of employees, and contracting for individuals to perform services; (2) prohibition of overtime; (3) termination of the services of retired annuitants, permanent intermittent employees, seasonal employees, temporary help workers and, student assistants; and (4) suspension of personal services contracts. 

            NOW, THEREFORE, I, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the statutes of the State of California, do hereby issue the following orders to become effective immediately:

            IT IS ORDERED that the services and functions of state government directly related to the preservation and protection of human life and safety, including but not limited to emergency and disaster response activities and the provision of 24-hour medical care, shall be deemed critical and exempt from this Order.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that except for services and functions of state government deemed critical and exempt by this Order, all State agencies and departments under my direct executive authority take immediate action effective July 31, 2008 to cease and desist hiring of employees (except in instances in which there is a bona fide offer and acceptance prior to the effective date of this Order), transferring employees between State agencies and departments, promoting employees, and contracting for individuals to perform services. 

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that except for services and functions of state government deemed critical and exempt by this Order and emergent situations to preserve and protect human life and safety, all State agencies and departments under my direct executive authority take immediate action to cease and desist authorization of all overtime for employees effective July 31, 2008.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that except for services and functions of state government deemed critical and exempt by this Order, all State agencies and departments under my direct executive authority take immediate action to terminate the services of the following five categories of employees and individuals effective July 31, 2008:  (1) Retired Annuitants; (2) Permanent Intermittent Employees; (3) Seasonal Employees; (4) Temporary Help Workers; and (5) Student Assistants.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that except for services and functions of state government deemed critical and exempt by this Order and except for services provided pursuant to multi-year contracts for Information Technology systems and services, all State agencies and departments under my direct executive authority take immediate action to suspend all personal services contracts effective July 31, 2008.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Agency Secretaries and Department Directors shall take immediate action to implement this Order, and any other action that will reduce state expenditures. 

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of the Department of Finance shall establish an exemption process that Agency Secretaries shall utilize to determine if an exemption is justified based on critical services and functions, which may include either cost-reducing or revenue-producing services and functions that will help ensure that there is sufficient cash for the State to make its payments. 

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Agency Secretaries and Cabinet-level Directors shall report their exemptions to the Cabinet Secretary and the Director of the Department of Finance within 24 hours of approving an exemption.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of the Department of Finance and Director of the Department of Personnel Administration shall work with the State Controller to develop and implement the necessary mechanisms, including but not limited to pay letters and computer programs, to comply with the California Supreme Court's White v. Davis opinion to pay federal minimum wage to those nonexempt FLSA employees who did not work any overtime. 

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the necessary mechanisms to ensure compliance with the White v. Davis opinion must be in place to be effective for the August 2008 payroll.

            IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED that during this budget impasse, the State Treasurer shall take all actions necessary to maintain the State's ability to pay its bond obligations, including payment of principal and interest with funds in the State Treasury, and shall take all actions that are necessary to protect the State's funds and investments.

            IT IS FURTHER REQUESTED that other entities of State government not under my direct executive authority, including the California Public Utilities Commission, the University of California, the California State University, California Community Colleges, constitutional officers, the legislative branch (including the Legislative Counsel Bureau), and judicial branch, assist in the implementation of this Order and implement similar mitigation measures that will help to preserve the State's cash supply during this budget impasse.

            IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall remain in effect until such time as both a Fiscal Year 2008-09 Budget is adopted and the Director of the Department of Finance confirms an adequate cash balance exists to meet the State's fiscal obligations. 

            I FURTHER DIRECT that as soon as hereafter possible, this Order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given to this Order.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of California to be affixed this 31st day of July 2008.


ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Governor of California


ATTEST:


DEBRA BOWEN
Secretary of State

Logged
Eric
Resident Resident
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 15
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,620



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2008, 04:08:28 PM »

In case anyone is wondering how this will affect you, the Department of Personnel Administration has updated their site...

http://www.dpa.ca.gov/news/news/2008/20080731-01.htm
Logged

Click here to tell your friends and family about the Sacramento, CA Online Community!
Pages: [1] Print 
The Sacramento, CA Online Community | Sacramento, CA Discussion | Politics | California | Topic: Schwarzenegger plans to sign wage cut, layoff order Thursday « previous next »
Jump to:  


Vote for the Sacramento, CA Online Community!

Sacto Classifieds.com
Sacramento eRealty .com
Sac Ratings .com
Sac Community .com
Sacramento Magazine
Humor Times - Funniest Paper on the Planet!





Sacramento News | Sacramento Gas Prices | Sacramento Weather | Sacramento Auctions | Sacramento Dating
Sacramento Real Estate | Sacramento Web Cams | Sacramento Traffic | Sacramento Hotels | Sacramento Jobs


Add To Favorites (ctrl+D) | Set As Startpage | Tell A Friend | Help Promote | Link To Us

Home | Sacramento Forums | Forum Rules | Information | Links | Sponsors | Advertising | Contact Us | Site Map

All Content Copyright © 2007 SacForums.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Sacramento, CA Online Community Feed Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com