Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 24, 2008, 05:23:00 AM

Login with username, password and session length

News   ·    Gas Prices   ·    Weather   ·    Auctions   ·    Dating
Real Estate   ·    WebCams   ·    Traffic   ·    Hotels   ·    Jobs
Take a peek at Sacramento through the various web cams, traffic cams and weather cams in the area! Click here!
3,700 Posts in 1,606 Topics by 952 Members
Latest Member: teriincali
Search: Advanced search
View Your Startpage | Forum Rules | Advertising | Sacramento, California Online Community feed  

The Sacramento, CA Online Community | Sacramento, CA Discussion | Politics | Sacramento Area | Topic: Help slow Sacramento sprawl
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »

 
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Help slow Sacramento sprawl  (Read 839 times)
randb
Newbie
*

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39



View Profile
« on: April 12, 2007, 12:01:15 PM »

Do you care about sprawl in the greater Sacramento area?  We need more infill projects, not large developments outside of urban areas.  Especially when those areas do not have the infrastructure to support the growth.  Rancho Murieta is one such area.  For those that are not familiar with Rancho Murieta, it is located about 25 miles from downtown up Jackson Highway.  Developers want to build thousands of new homes in Rancho Murieta.  In addition to destroying the topography and cutting down thousands of oak these news homes will increase sprawl in Sacramento.  Rancho Murieta does not have large employers and almost all working adult in Rancho Murieta must drive a 20+ miles to get to their jobs.  We do not need thousands of more people adding to our already congested roads. 

The issues surrounding development are vast and stretch far beyond the sprawl issue.  There was recent article in the Sacramento News and Review about the history of the fight in Rancho Murieta.  The CA Department of Real Estate, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, CalTrans, and State Attorney General have all issued opinions specific to this development that side with residents that want limited rural growth.   

Even with all of the overwhelming evidence against developing this area the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors may still vote to approve it.  Only one supervisor Don Nottoli actually represents the Rancho Murieta area.  The other supervisors do not care because Rancho Murieta does not represent their voting block and the developers are very large campaign contributors.  That is where you can help.  We need people to write letters that do not support uncontrolled growth in Rancho Murieta, especially without a new master plan (the current one is 25 years old).  The only thing that combat the influence of  campaign contributions is voters in the supervisor own district.  Please take the time to write a brief letter to your supervisor and let them know that one of their voters does not approve of sprawl.  Here is a map of the districts.  Below is the contact information for the supervisors.  Also if you can forward any letters to info@preservemurieta.org so we can keep track that would be greatly appreciated.

Roger Dickinson - District 1
700 H Street, Suite 2450
Sacramento CA 95814
dickinsonr@saccounty.net

Jimmie R. Yee - District 2
700 H Street, Suite 2450
Sacramento CA 95814
jyee@saccounty.net
               
Susan Peters - District 3
700 H Street, Suite 2450
Sacramento CA 95814
susanpeters@saccounty.net

Roberta MacGlashan - District 4
700 H Street, Suite 2450
Sacramento CA 95814
macglashanr@saccounty.net

Thank you, PreserveMurieta.org
Logged

attagirl
Full Member
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 100


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2007, 09:52:53 AM »

You know that when you start running out of land, that most areas will eventually be developed whether or not you want it to happen. When there is growth it warrants the development. I would really start see developers buying up old old outdated property and fixing it up or tearing down and rebuilding.
Logged
randb
Newbie
*

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2007, 10:10:07 AM »

There is a proper way to develop and many agencies including the state attorney general have chimmed in and said the developers in Rancho Murieta are not developing according to current laws.
Logged

wburg
Jr. Member
**

Karma: 5
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2007, 02:17:44 PM »

What makes property "outdated"?

And the problem with developing everywhere, especially developing inefficient things like single-family suburbs and strip malls fed by freeways, is that you use up available space a lot faster. Not all growth warrants the development--some does more harm than good. Remember that a lot of this growth is taking place on prime agricultural land--when we run out of farmland, where do we get our food?
Logged
fk310
Newbie
*

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2007, 01:39:50 AM »

I think Sacramento's main focus on development should be the creation of a strong city core. This will work wonders in reinforcing Sacramento's identity, raising its civic profile, increasing civic pride and also raising Sacramento's stature amongst California cities.

It's finally happening now that there seems to be a lot of new life being ushered into the Midtown area. But the residential population in the core is still too low. There needs to be more residential areas in the Downtown and Midtown Areas. We definitely need to focus on rebuilding areas such as the K Street Pedestrian Mall, Alkali Flats, the Railyards, Oak Park and many others.
Logged

Visit my Blog! www.crepeguy.com
wburg
Jr. Member
**

Karma: 5
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2007, 10:32:58 AM »

We need denser housing throughout the city, and yes, we need more housing downtown--of all income levels. Most of the new housing going up is inaccessible to most of the people who work downtown, for whom it makes the most sense to live in the central city. More people living and working downtown means fewer commuters and less gridlock. Lots of this rebuilding is happening.

Hopefully, this rebuilding will follow the historic modes that already exist in the central city: our historic neighborhoods provide the prototypes for "transit-oriented" and "walkable" development, because they were built before the era of automobile commuting, when walking or public transit was how people got around.

Mayor Fargo has said, though, that the problem isn't how to fix downtown, but how to fix the suburbs. The draft of the new Sacramento general plan includes provision for urban nodes throughout the city (in the north area, in south Sacramento and in the east) that will provide more density and urban environments outside of the central city, and help Sacramento escape its current form of suburbs in all directions.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
The Sacramento, CA Online Community | Sacramento, CA Discussion | Politics | Sacramento Area | Topic: Help slow Sacramento sprawl « previous next »
Jump to:  


SacRatings.com
Vote for the Sacramento, CA Online Community!
Humor Times - Funniest Paper on the Planet!





Sacramento News | Sacramento Gas Prices | Sacramento Weather | Sacramento Auctions | Sacramento Dating
Sacramento Real Estate | Sacramento Web Cams | Sacramento Traffic | Sacramento Hotels | Sacramento Jobs


Add To Favorites (ctrl+D) | Set As Startpage | Tell A Friend | Help Promote | Link To Us

Home | Sacramento Forums | Forum Rules | Information | Links | Sponsors | Advertising | Contact Us | Site Map

All Content Copyright © 2007 SacForums.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Sacramento, CA Online Community Feed Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com